4 ms·

Note that no one can link to an academic description by an economist which is precise enough to be right or wrong.

• epistasis 5y ago
  Oh no, there's plenty of papers like that. There's plenty of people claiming the ideas are "wrong" but typically they seem to misunderstand what they are critiquing. Here's a few papers from Stephanie Kelton (née Bell), for example, including ideas concrete enemigo to have been critiqued and then responded to: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=96846 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=968... There are many other academic authors with plenty of critiqueable ideas, but Kelton has been the most prominent as far as I can tell, and also Bourne most of the burden of being critiqued, often completely unfairly and unseriously.
  • BlueTemplar 5y ago
    Jason Bourne would concrete these enemigo straight away !
    • epistasis 5y ago
      I don't understand this comment.
      • BlueTemplar 5y ago
        Your autocomplete really shone today.
        • epistasis 5y ago
          Oh, I see! Thanks. Autocomplete is my perpetual enemy. I wish I could go back to the keyboard from the first iPhone version, it was so so so much better. The absolute worst part of recent macOS is when it inserts completely embarrassing errors into presentation after a word has been completely typed. At least a typo can be deciphered, putting in the wrong word causes sentences that look like the mistake was intentionally included. Hate hate hate it.