4 ms·
Since the scientists didn’t really see it happening, I would add “without evidence” to the title.
by temp8964 5y ago
Since the scientists didn’t really see it happening, I would add “without evidence” to the title.
- mkl 5y agoThe article explains some of the evidence, and their academic papers explain more.
- temp8964 5y agoOf course there is evidence. But today's journalists like to reject the evidence and add the 'Without evidence' catchphrase. I chose to not add "/s".
- mannykannot 5y agoMaybe they should add “without evidence” to the title simply because temp8964 did not see it happen, and anything less is heresay.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]