3 ms·
Advocates of FSF argue that if Neo4j changed the AGPL license in a way that invalidates the intent and principle behind AGPL, they can no longer refer to it as
by webmobdev 4y ago
Advocates of FSF argue that if Neo4j changed the AGPL license in a way that invalidates the intent and principle behind AGPL, they can no longer refer to it as an AGPL license. And if they do so it is false advertising. The court has agreed with this assertion and also said due to the changes in the license, Neo4j was doing false advertising by claiming it was "free and opensource".