3 ms·
Can't you though? I'm pretty sure you can public class SomeClass<E extends Exception> { public someMethod() throws E {} } is valid java, I'm p
by delusional 5y ago
Can't you though? I'm pretty sure you can
public class SomeClass<E extends Exception> {
public someMethod() throws E {}
}
is valid java, I'm pretty sure.
- int_19h 5y agoIt is valid Java, but this code lets you specify only a single exception type, while exception specifications can (and usually do) have multiple types. And Java doesn't have the equivalent of C++ template parameter packs. The other problem with this approach is that it requires the caller to explicitly specify all the exceptions thrown by the function/object being wrapped. So every time you do map() or fold(), you have to spell out the full exception spec for the closure you're passing in. And god help you if there's nested maps...
- int_19h 5y agoBTW, the original structurally-typed proposal for closures in Java included generic exception specifications (among many other things). Unfortunately, that was killed off in favor of a much simpler take. http://javac.info/closures-v06a.html http://javac.info/closures-v06a.html