> Yes, because a citizen is forcible removed from his native country. And because he can get much more severe punishment that we would get in his own country.

> Yes, because a citizen is forcible removed from his native country. And because he can get much more severe punishment that we would get in his own country. And? As I said citizens have rights but also duties as citizens, and constitutions establish these rights and duties. If a countries constitution acknowledges a supra-national treaty or authority, which is their rights as free and independent countries, then none of the defendant rights are getting violated provided the extradition treaty grants due process to contest that extradition. So being hyperbolic by claiming it's equal to "slavery", in an attempt at appealing to emotion, just makes your argument sound unhinged, at best. What's next? Extradition treaties are "racist"?