All the indication we need at this point is relative progress. If we can agree that it's getting closer to what humans do, then acting like it's surely not goin

All the indication we need at this point is relative progress. If we can agree that it's getting closer to what humans do, then acting like it's surely not going to surpass us anytime soon feels like Go, Dota or SC all over again – and at some point arrogance in face of surmounting evidence feels a little desperate (although I am certain there'll always be someone who can explain why this time, surely, it's all different) > Note the difference, though, with a real artist. A real artist takes as input the real world This is exactly where an AI is going to easily surpass any human and it does not even require any fantasy: A human can only have so many inputs before they die. They can only take in so much data at a time. And they will then take some real human time to process all of this and make something off it. An AI is virtually limitless in all of these respects.