3 ms·
You might want to do yourself a favor and move your browser width out a bit more. 940 is a commonly used width content for many grid based frameworks. That 94
by rjd 15y ago
You might want to do yourself a favor and move your browser width out a bit more.
940 is a commonly used width content for many grid based frameworks. That 940 doesn't include an internal margin, instead it is handle by an external 10px margin taking the whole width upto 960px.
Check out 960.gs for their framework, but they aren't alone in those figures, because of the way it subdivides.
- tesseract 15y agoSorry, but I want web designers to do me a favor and make sites that, even if they don't look perfect, at least don't horribly break in my ~860px wide browser window. Which, I feel compelled to point out, is a full 100px wider than an iPad in portrait. Actually I would rather use a browser width of 600-700px, as that would fill around half the width of my 13" laptop screen, and be more typographically optimal in terms of not requiring as much horizontal eye scanning, and not stretching out paragraphs into 2 or 3 line horizontal stripes. But there are too many websites out there that assume I have a giant monitor and a browser window that's maximized to fill it.
- rjd 15y agoWell for users with fringe case scenarios such as yourself most modern browsers have client side style sheets. As for the iPad... it scales websites to fit its format, so I'm not sure what the issue if there.