> technologically superior and higher quality option winning over a cheap and simple one It was a direct answer to that question, and IMO a good one. Some in t

> technologically superior and higher quality option winning over a cheap and simple one It was a direct answer to that question, and IMO a good one. Some in this thread appear to feel that we inexorably move towards a disposable culture, and this is a clear counterexample. How is directly answering a question with a counterexample not contributing to the discussion? I shouldn't be so annoyed at this, but I admit that I am.