4 ms·
You can just read her Wikipedia site, she has a history of making correlation implies causation claims and has received plenty of criticism from other scientist
by cinntaile 5y ago
You can just read her Wikipedia site, she has a history of making correlation implies causation claims and has received plenty of criticism from other scientists in different fields.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephanie_Seneff https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephanie_Seneff
It's not a scientific report.
- mgh2 5y agoThey collaborated: But you have to ask, did big media and industry shut her out? Wikipedia is not a reliable source, neither is this, but the more the better https://gmofreewashington.com/our-experts/nancy-swanson/ https://gmofreewashington.com/our-experts/nancy-swanson/
- cinntaile 5y agoThe sources are cited though, you don't have to trust what is written in the Wikipedia article. You can verify by reading them instead.
- mgh2 5y agoShe might not be an expert and the work might have been sloppy, and sure "correlation is not causation", but that doesn't discount her initial observations and hypotheses that needs further investigation https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32897110/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32897110/ Bonus from OP: The Bleedind Edge https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8106576/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_5 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8106576/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_5