3 ms·
Note: GMOs consensus is that it is safe, but big industry has been known to silence subjects who question them (scientists, journalists, whistleblowers, etc.) d
by mgh2 5y ago
Note: GMOs consensus is that it is safe, but big industry has been known to silence subjects who question them (scientists, journalists, whistleblowers, etc.) due to profit incentives.
Ex: Monsanto, fat vs. sugar, Theranos - watch Dopesick, The Dropout, Dark Waters, etc.
There is a slight chance this report was not formally published and peer-reviewed for these reasons. Need a critical eye from the HN community.
Here is a related published study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392553/
- cinntaile 5y agoYou can just read her Wikipedia site, she has a history of making correlation implies causation claims and has received plenty of criticism from other scientists in different fields. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephanie_Seneff https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephanie_Seneff It's not a scientific report.
- mgh2 5y agoThey collaborated: But you have to ask, did big media and industry shut her out? Wikipedia is not a reliable source, neither is this, but the more the better https://gmofreewashington.com/our-experts/nancy-swanson/ https://gmofreewashington.com/our-experts/nancy-swanson/
- cinntaile 5y agoThe sources are cited though, you don't have to trust what is written in the Wikipedia article. You can verify by reading them instead.
- mgh2 5y agoShe might not be an expert and the work might have been sloppy, and sure "correlation is not causation", but that doesn't discount her initial observations and hypotheses that needs further investigation https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32897110/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32897110/ Bonus from OP: The Bleedind Edge https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8106576/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_5 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8106576/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_5