> Practically speaking, large employers would be required to compensate employees the same amount of pay for fewer hours worked. Not sure that's true, unless t

> Practically speaking, large employers would be required to compensate employees the same amount of pay for fewer hours worked. Not sure that's true, unless the bill also mandates that employers continue paying the same amount to salaried employees. I assume what'll happen instead is that salaries go down to compensate, and wage employees get fewer hours. Personally, I'd be okay with that, but many people wouldn't want to take that hit. Worth noting that this article is written by Fisher Phillips, a law firm that, according to Wikipedia, represents management exclusively, so they are not an unbiased source.