3 ms·
Sorry but not even north Korea would use bombers, however fighters are good for airspace policing...but shooting down bombers....that's 60's mindset.
by nix23 5y ago
Sorry but not even north Korea would use bombers, however fighters are good for airspace policing...but shooting down bombers....that's 60's mindset.
- throwaway894345 5y agoNo need to apologize. NK doesn’t use bombers because fighters and are prolific. Without those fighters bombers become more viable.
- nix23 5y agoI think you should educate yourself about something called rockets.
- throwaway894345 5y agoI converse here on HN because the discourse is usually a little higher than the “middle school” level that you find elsewhere on the Internet. Won’t you join me in preserving that property?
- nix23 5y agoIf you change your username, i don't like talk to "throwaway"-trolls
- throwaway894345 5y agoMy name has the string "throwaway" in it, but I have 4x your karma so I think it's safe to say I'm just as valid a contributor in this community as you are. Anyway, neither of us are using our legal names, so I don't know why you're throwing that stone in particular. That said, you're breaking the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- nix23 5y ago>That said, you're breaking the site guidelines >>usually a little higher than the “middle school” You too.
- throwaway894345 5y agoI'm sure you weren't trying to mislead by sharing a cropped version of my quote which may seem more nefarious than the full sentence; however, it should be noted that the original sentence read: > I converse here on HN because the discourse is usually a little higher than the “middle school” level that you find elsewhere on the Internet. Rather than your edit: > usually a little higher than the “middle school” Edits like these don't inspire good faith discussion. Frankly, I think this thread has thoroughly outlived its useful life.