How does the funding or political position of the Review invalidate the story told here? If you acknowlege that the facts are as laid out, is your objection tha

How does the funding or political position of the Review invalidate the story told here? If you acknowlege that the facts are as laid out, is your objection that you disagree with who the good guys and bad guys are? Or do you think embarassing facts about the Stanford prof should have been suppressed?