5 ms·
Incredibly misleading, he didn't directly paste bios into the description and they were massively curated.
by donkarma 5y ago
Incredibly misleading, he didn't directly paste bios into the description and they were massively curated.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- educaysean 5y agoYeah, learning this fact definitely dulled my initial astonishment. These are still really fantastic results, but it's hard to feel too excited without the knowledge of just how much curative efforts took place behind the curtain.
- platers 5y agoAs a lower bound we now know a non artist can produce passable art in a few minutes. There is indeed a large practical difference between a few minutes and a few seconds, but I trust in the power of incremental progress.
- dntrkv 5y agoIf one of these images came out of a set of 1000 I would still be impressed.
- throwaway675309 5y agoOf course they're CURATED, but there are several links where he shows the full set of images that were generated and I would say between 70 to 80% of them are pretty decent aesthetically speaking. Given that it's able to generate a dozen images in less than a minute, and all I have to do is pick out the ones that are aesthetically pleasing, I'd say that's a damn good win.
- 55555 5y agoHe’s curated those links too, though.
- nicklovescode 5y agono those full results screenshots were the first things i typed in