3 ms·
Well I suppose a machine could accidentally create good art, just like a human could. But it would only appear to be good art, the same way that randomly enumer
by randomsearch 5y ago
Well I suppose a machine could accidentally create good art, just like a human could. But it would only appear to be good art, the same way that randomly enumerating all possible HD images would at some point produce a Picasso.
But deliberately, no, it couldn’t, not yet, and human conceptual artists could make far far superior art than a machine. Because great art requires understanding the human condition and deep reasoning about the world.
- totony 5y agoModels are not in a vacuum, their outputs are selected and guided by humans (here captions). The human can have the deeper understand while the model has specific understanding on styles for example.
- randomsearch 5y agoI definitely think a human could use an AI to assist in the creation of great art (and to be clear, that is synonymous with conceptual art to me and also most people with a modern degree in fine art). A comparison can be made with Damien Hurst’s or Anthony Gormley’s use of assistants to create the pieces as instructed by the artists. Duchamp’s urinal isn’t brilliant because the urinal was difficult to acquire or to make, but because it expresses so much and asks so many questions.