4 ms·
Also... where is the accompanying data indicating how many Twitter accounts (in the same period of time) added ".eth" to their usernames? This list seems so use
by staindk 5y ago
Also... where is the accompanying data indicating how many Twitter accounts (in the same period of time) added ".eth" to their usernames? This list seems so useless without that other side to compare.
If only 25 accounts added ".eth" you could start to make inferences. If it's some number at all close to 3900 you can't really. And if it's greater than 3900 then you're being incredibly disingenuous by only posting this side of things.
- ilamont 5y agoVia the author: The flip side here is that we observed 35,267 accounts with “.eth” in their display names who aren’t on this list (yet). https://twitter.com/travisbrown/status/1511668595826335746 https://twitter.com/travisbrown/status/1511668595826335746
- staindk 5y agoThanks, had not seen this. The initial tweet mentions 3.9k accounts dropped the ".eth" recently. The 'flip side' data to that would be looking at the same time scale I think - how many people added ".eth" during the same time? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯