2 ms·
I'm with you in that a lot of TS use seems dogmatic or ritualistic today. I have a strong feeling in the near future we're going to see the bow string snap bac
by qbasic_forever 5y ago
I'm with you in that a lot of TS use seems dogmatic or ritualistic today. I have a strong feeling in the near future we're going to see the bow string snap back and simple zero build, basic dynamic use of pure JS comes back in vogue.
- krapp 5y agoIt seems to be coming back as 'vanilla JS' so maybe there's hope.
- ceeplusplus 5y agoTS is about readability and maintainability of code at scale. Having types helps immensely in understanding a new codebase and working in a large codebase with many other people.
- krapp 5y agoThe problem is Javascript has been entirely commoditized by enterprise, so solutions which should only be relevant to "code at scale" have become mandatory at any scale. You practically can't distribute a Javascript library without writing it in Typescript and submitting it to NPM, with the build step expected. Yet writing even complex javascript without Typescript and having it work is still entirely possible, just as it is with other weakly typed languages. There should still be room for that, but the concept of simply writing javascript has become so alien it needs to be reintroduced as "vanilla javascript."