3 ms·
Taken to the extreme: if you allocate literally all resources to fighting global warming, you're bound to end up with no resources for something. Let's take nuc
by rhn_mk1 5y ago
Taken to the extreme: if you allocate literally all resources to fighting global warming, you're bound to end up with no resources for something. Let's take nuclear disarmament as a trivial example.
Moreover, I'm not seeing what job loss has to do with the parent's statement.
- plaguepilled 5y agoI think that any approach to climate change needs to actively monitor the motivations that a given country has to sabotage it. In that respect, I don't think that climate change is solved by 'just give the EV companies all the money ever' but by pro actively addressing and then monitoring those detractive motives, nuclear threat inclusive.