4 ms·
Them calling it merely "sub-millimeter" seems a bit like selling it short. The image in the article is about 1500 pixels wide (the stone part of it), and is 36m
by taneliv 5y ago
Them calling it merely "sub-millimeter" seems a bit like selling it short. The image in the article is about 1500 pixels wide (the stone part of it), and is 36mm according to Wikipedia. [1] I measured some fine details to be about three pixels in size. That would be 72 µm, which perhaps gives a different idea than a hand-wavy "sub-millimeter". For comparison, Intel's 8008 has a node size of 10 µm.
(I hope I got the measurements and units correctly. The numbers seem slightly too impressive, corrections welcome.)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griffin_Warrior_Tomb https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griffin_Warrior_Tomb