3 ms·
SO lets apply logic to your statement. How can applying more resources to climate change be a misallocation of resources? Lookat this way, when jobs that are l
by fredgrott 5y ago
SO lets apply logic to your statement. How can applying more resources to climate change be a misallocation of resources?
Lookat this way, when jobs that are less efficient and re-structured to be more efficient the tendency is that we have job losses. Those can and will be offset by the re-allocation of resources towards green energy in the form of brand new jobs and career opportunities.
We can either fear the unknown or want to explore it.
- rhn_mk1 5y agoTaken to the extreme: if you allocate literally all resources to fighting global warming, you're bound to end up with no resources for something. Let's take nuclear disarmament as a trivial example. Moreover, I'm not seeing what job loss has to do with the parent's statement.
- plaguepilled 5y agoI think that any approach to climate change needs to actively monitor the motivations that a given country has to sabotage it. In that respect, I don't think that climate change is solved by 'just give the EV companies all the money ever' but by pro actively addressing and then monitoring those detractive motives, nuclear threat inclusive.