4 ms·
Here's the discussion from reddit. It appears as though the developer is loudly promising PIII emulation but has a history of not delivering. I would guess th
by ChrisRR 5y ago
Here's the discussion from reddit. It appears as though the developer is loudly promising PIII emulation but has a history of not delivering.
I would guess this article is an effort to distance themselves from this dev if people google it
https://www.reddit.com/r/emulation/comments/tjnxg3/why_not_pentium_iii_86box/ https://www.reddit.com/r/emulation/comments/tjnxg3/why_not_p...
- rnd0 5y ago>Here's the discussion from reddit. It appears as though the developer is loudly promising PIII emulation but has a history of not delivering. The developer of 86Box as a rule has a history of backing up their claims -hence 86Box which has gone from strength to strength in the years since being forced to fork from pcem. A *LOT* of people float into the project's discord and ask "pentium III when?" -this addresses that, as well as answering the overly ambitious promises made by a recent fork of 86box.
- dada78641 5y agoFrankly, despite being in r/emulation, most of these people seem like they're new to the emulation scene with how dismissive they're being about this statement. It's as if they're unaware of just how much drama can happen behind the scenes and how it's sometimes useful to just clearly and unambiguously state "this is what happened from our perspective." Having the wrong scope can be very detrimental to a project in general, and although I'm not an emulator developer I feel this is probably especially true in this case.