3 ms·
Disclaimer: didn’t downvote. Because it contrasts something from 1979 with something from 2001 and fails to explain how this is a relevant example for the disc
by Someone1234 5y ago
Disclaimer: didn’t downvote.
Because it contrasts something from 1979 with something from 2001 and fails to explain how this is a relevant example for the discussion.
- darkerside 5y ago> technologically superior and higher quality option winning over a cheap and simple one It was a direct answer to that question, and IMO a good one. Some in this thread appear to feel that we inexorably move towards a disposable culture, and this is a clear counterexample. How is directly answering a question with a counterexample not contributing to the discussion? I shouldn't be so annoyed at this, but I admit that I am.