3 ms·
You can absolutely ship a game with blueprints. The performance drop is relatively minor. There are some things that are impossible to do in blueprints, but man
by oneoff786 5y ago
You can absolutely ship a game with blueprints. The performance drop is relatively minor. There are some things that are impossible to do in blueprints, but many games will not need them, or can just handle that small % in c++, which is what I do. Specifically I refer to complicated rpc stuff.
> To illustrate this create a blueprint for a simple C++ loop with a dozen switch statements with conditionals inside each, that is a lot of mouse clicks, movements and typing. When you write code, you don't need to worry about how to organize nodes that is readable, there is no hand eye coordination of where to place your conditional node that will branch easily to a dozen or more wired connection.
For each node -> Switch nodes -> switch nodes.
Collapse the switch nodes so that you have only one master switch statement. Easy. And way way cleaner than code imo. And less time to code as you don’t need to manually specify each switch if it’s something nice like an enum?