4 ms·

The tone of that article makes sure that I stop reading after 2 paragraphs.

• hvdijk 5y ago
  I did not last even two paragraphs: I clicked through on "Ubuntu MATE cannot be trusted" and found something better summarised as "I tried getting away with calling people idiots on Ubuntu MATE forums in a bizarre social experiment and cannot deal with them not putting up with that."
  • Narann 5y ago
    Same, it's disturbing: * OP: "If a distro with 60k packages cannot accommodate one or three extra packages for an official flavor, then someone is an idiot, and that idiot is not me." * Moderator came and ask to not talk like this. * OP: "Censorship, simply because I used the word “idiot” without naming anyone in particular!", and OP continue. * Moderator close the tread. * OP: "Then the little Stalin closed my thread". This is not serious. OP doesn't named anyone but hide himself with a general attack to package maintainer (maybe this maintainer is alone). Hiding its attitude behind word meaning is something my 9 years old son is starting to do and I try to explain him its not a valid excuse. OP should revise it's social expectations. It's hard enough to keep big open source projects on rails without having childish attitude like this.
    • exfascist 5y ago
      I'm anti censorship and post ideas controversial enough to get banned from here pretty often but personal attacks are just stupid. There's no reason for that.
• deng 5y ago
  Yeah, the tone of the article makes me think that there might be a great future for GTK-based Desktop Environments ahead.