Why is it unexpected? It seems rather logical to me. The particular interaction between clauses on the license looks like a contract "bug". Why would Neo4j add

Why is it unexpected? It seems rather logical to me. The particular interaction between clauses on the license looks like a contract "bug". Why would Neo4j add such a clause to the license if they intended it to have no effect? The reasonable interpretation is that they did intend the added clause to mean what it says. What the writer of the original license template (the AGPL) wants is not relevant. Regardless, it's probably not very wise to take an established license like AGPL and amend it like this.