4 ms·
> Rent is pissing away money, and from the rates I've seen, the monthly rent on a house is often very close to the monthly mortgage payment, so the "investing t
by leetcrew 5y ago
> Rent is pissing away money, and from the rates I've seen, the monthly rent on a house is often very close to the monthly mortgage payment, so the "investing the difference ins S&P500" ends up being moot.
this varies a lot locale to locale. in some places the rent is very close to the monthly mortgage payment. in some places, the mortgage is much higher.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/price-to-rent-ratio.asp https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/price-to-rent-ratio.asp
if you're damn sure you want to live somewhere long enough to pay off a 15 year mortgage, then yeah, odds are it's better than renting. most people can't be 100% sure of that, so to make it a fair calculation you also have to include the costs of buying and selling. in theory, you should also have to price in the risk of having so much money concentrated in a single asset, but it seems to be a matter of policy that housing prices are never allowed to go down.
- dragonwriter 5y ago> in theory, you should also have to price in the risk of having so much money concentrated in a single asset, but it seems to be a matter of policy that housing prices are never allowed to go down. And the benefits of having it tied up in an asset covered by things like, in certain jurisdictions, generous bankruptcy homestead exemptions and, in certain jurisdictions, financed by a mortgage in a no-recourse jurisdiction; there are downside risk protections attached to owner-occupied housing that aren't available elsewhere.