3 ms·
I absolute care about "speed of maintainence". There is no reason "speed of development" need be construed to mean banging out the initial garbage prototype, an
by Ericson2314 5y ago
I absolute care about "speed of maintainence". There is no reason "speed of development" need be construed to mean banging out the initial garbage prototype, and only that. We can be tortoises rather than hares and still care about average speed long term.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- nightski 5y agoI think we are more in agreement than your post suggests! I was mostly against the notion in the original post that dynamic/interpreted languages are the pinnacle of development speed (which is why I thought the article was referring to "speed of development" as slinging code). In reality, I care about the same average speed long term as you do and for that I'd take a statically typed language any day.
- Ericson2314 5y agoGlad to hear it!! :) I agree untyped for more developer speed is a bad joke.