4 ms·
> Question: What is the equivalent way to do this today? I don't think there is an equivalent, because as I explained here, the very noticeable, very significa
by anyfoo 5y ago
> Question: What is the equivalent way to do this today?
I don't think there is an equivalent, because as I explained here, the very noticeable, very significant gains in almost every aspect that even simple hardware upgrades brought haven't been a thing for a long time: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30951533 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30951533
It's not just that back then an "extremely expensive supercomputer" workstation effectively enabled you to do a lot of things that we take for absolutely granted nowadays in the first place. When not having such a beast meant essentially not being able to do any serious CAD (whether mechanical or electrical engineering), large scale software engineering, number crunching, anything related to graphics/visuals...
It's also that super mundane tasks like writing a letter, editing an image, or even just booting your computer received a significant, immediately noticeable boost for comparably plain seeming hardware upgrades like a 33MHz higher clock or a bit more L1 cache.
- zozbot234 5y agoTrue, but I think hyperscale gear that's $200k nowadays from specialty vendors (much like those workstations of old) might easily become "commodity" enough in the next 10 to 15 years, and that's what Alan Kay was really trying to get at. What might that be useful for, in the hands of a single person? That's a really interesting question, and I don't have a sure-fire answer. (Even AI inference on the huge models that seem to be popular as of late - an easy choice for something that will chew through a lot of data and compute - feels like way too much of a toy to be genuinely useful.)