4 ms·
> I'm probably missing something obvious No, you're not. The article is actually just braindead enough to suggest that shipping your build and cryptographic si
by orthecreedence 5y ago
> I'm probably missing something obvious
No, you're not. The article is actually just braindead enough to suggest that shipping your build and cryptographic signing steps to third-parties is more secure.
This isn't just wrong, it's almost criminally devious (and blatantly in service to the ever-growing surveillance state).
- hulitu 5y agoYou are right except with using the adverb "braindead". I really think they are doing it on purpose. The aim is that the netizen gets a licence for everything he has: car, house, devices. The "Companies" control every device and the life of the netizen . And this security theater is just there that the netizen does not interfere with their data collection.