>Nobody sees nuclear as a viable path forward except the nuclear industry. This is provably false on many fronts. There is a growing recognition that nuclear

>Nobody sees nuclear as a viable path forward except the nuclear industry. This is provably false on many fronts. There is a growing recognition that nuclear is the only low carbon source that can produce substantial carbon-free power in all weather conditions and all latitudes. "There were over 50 additional nuclear reactors under construction in 2020, and hundreds more are planned primarily in Asia." https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/01/energy-nuclear-power-production-electricity-sustainable/ https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/01/energy-nuclear-power-... https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/nuclear-power-energy-transition https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/nuclear-power-energy-... https://www.mercurynews.com/2022/03/23/tech-billionaires-rally-around-nuclear-as-energy-crisis-looms/ https://www.mercurynews.com/2022/03/23/tech-billionaires-ral... Nuclear may or may not become the dominant energy source, but to say "Nobody sees nuclear as a viable path forward" is simply incorrect.