3 ms·
I've thought about why this has been the most stable system experience for me, and I think it comes down to simplicity: my linux system just has far fewer movin
by gtf21 5y ago
I've thought about why this has been the most stable system experience for me, and I think it comes down to simplicity: my linux system just has far fewer moving parts than my mac did (I can read the process list and mostly understand everything that's running at any given time).
I think the main problem is that the simplicity of my system comes from the fact that I have set up each part of it, by hand, to do exactly what I want it to do, which is definitely _not_ realistic for the majority of users (for whom a mac is considerably easier to set up, even if less stable).
- zeagle 5y agoI think you have answered your own first post's question with the second paragraph of this post. I also gave pretty concrete examples in my original, downvoted post of how a using a laptop that was designed to run well with linux more or less out of the box based on hardware choices still falls short. I'm happy your transition was smoother than mine!