3 ms·
Their sample size was only 74 papers from one field of study. It's easy to get onto the "science isn't working" bandwagon, but how about some more convincing e
by spicybright 5y ago
Their sample size was only 74 papers from one field of study.
It's easy to get onto the "science isn't working" bandwagon, but how about some more convincing evidence to prove it's happening as widespread as the claims they're making are.
You know... maybe treating it a bit more scientifically to prove your point.
- Isinlor 5y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis#Prevalence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis#Prevalence
- Bancakes 5y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_distribution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_distribution If it doesn't work for a well-picked sample, it probably doesn't work for the real world.
- lol_what 5y agothings like replication crisis being a matter of discourse is part of the scientific process. scientists notice results don't add up and slowly over time the thing corrects.