4 ms·

The most direct path to prove my point would be to start calling you names.

• Chris2048 5y ago
  only if you consider that a judgement of character (or at least, one equivalent to the OP). Can you fully expand on the things you say rather than leaving them cryptic? I'm having to guess what point you are making.
  • ganzuul 5y ago
    No I cannot fully expand on what I say. I can not predict the full extent of how you will interpret my words. You need good faith to be more valuable that a programmable object. This is why you assume the best about a person and if you overestimate then you carry the discussion forward. This is why unquestioning criticism, judgement, is of no substance.
    • SantalBlush 5y ago
      Your conclusion does not follow from your premise.