3 ms·
Is this ruliad the logos of philosophy? --- My own attempt at what Wolfram is doing resulted in: 1: f(a,a) 2: f(a,b) I call the former introspection and th
by ganzuul 5y ago
Is this ruliad the logos of philosophy?
---
My own attempt at what Wolfram is doing resulted in:
1: f(a,a)
2: f(a,b)
I call the former introspection and the latter is regular old composition. This seems to be a taxonomy of everything my discerning mind is capable of and hence the limit of what aspects of human experience I can peer review. The rest (the bulk) is mysticism and always-valid personal experience.
---
“Whatever we call reality, it is revealed to us only through the active construction in which we participate.”
– Ilya Prigogine, Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature (1984)
- vaillant 5y agoI think that identifying the ruliad with the "logos" makes sense - the idea that there's some underlying abstract shape to the universe that makes rationality possible in the first place.
- ganzuul 5y agoPerhaps we can back-propagate physics through mathematics to discover physical proof of logos? Then we could substantiate the claim that reality is not illusion composed of ever fluctuating qualia. That discovery would certainly fill this one with wonder.