2 ms·
Yes, this happened to me with my last position. Overall, they weren't one of the worst third party recruiters I've dealt with (though I shouldn't have dealt wi
by ravenstine 5y ago
Yes, this happened to me with my last position.
Overall, they weren't one of the worst third party recruiters I've dealt with (though I shouldn't have dealt with them at all), but they told me in the first few calls that the position was "fully remote". This was only half-true. It turned out that the employer wanted me to come in 1 to 2 times a week. That was during late-pandemic, so who knows whether that would have been changed to not being remote.
Maybe it was miscommunication, but there's no way I can know that. An honest or competent recruiter would have sorted out those facts.
IMO, do whatever you can to bypass recruiters. Networking, doing presentations, and even just finding the emails of those who are really in charge of hiring, have a much greater payoff with modest effort than dealing with recruiters, particularly of the third-party kind. I believe this is particularly true for junior developers. If you are junior developers, expect most recruiters who reach out to you to be scum of the earth who will drop you like a hot potato if a single employer doesn't end up hiring you. They will tell you that you have "all the skills" and are "perfect" for a position and then they'll ghost you just as fast. Don't take it personally. Those people suck.
- pc86 5y agoI'm not sure how selling something "fully remote" when you're expected to be in-office 40% of the time is only half-true. That's a complete fabrication. I would even have a hard time considering something fully remote if it required annual meetings or something, unless they were optional and remote-friendly.