3 ms·

Is milk being on every relief menu a sign that people had a derranged love for milk? Or just the strength of the milk lobby?

by ufo 5y ago

jhbadger 5y ago
I don't think you can easily separate the two. Things might start as a marketing campaign but then catch on in general culture. In modern culture, this would be true of bacon. Bacon was falling out of favor in the US in the 1980s as people were beginning to become heart and weight conscious. But then there was a massive marketing push and now bacon is everywhere even on things like donuts. People think bacon is the most wondrous food/flavor and probably don't associate their obsession with a marketing campaign.
- micromacrofoot 5y ago
  you see this in a lot of food trends through the years... a lot of marketing-pushed popularity people aren't even aware of almonds and avocados are incredibly popular at the moment despite being particularly bad for the environment, they have their own lobbying groups and political action committees
- MisterBastahrd 5y ago
  People in the 80s were specifically told that animal fats were bad, and so everyone got fatter as the adjunct for fats in foods was sugar. All those years of having to put up with oat bran muffins because it was "heart healthy"... yuck. Don't get me wrong, I love bran flakes as a cereal. But that's where they belong.
orthoxerox 5y ago
People ate less meat/poultry back then. Dairy and eggs were the most common sources of animal fats and protein.
thatguy0900 5y ago
I mean it is cheap while being nutrient and calorie dense. It makes sense to put on a relief menu lobby or no
kgr 5y ago
I don't think it's because of the milk lobby (which didn't exist until early 1900s according to other posts) because I once browsed a cookbook from the 1800s and noticed that many of the recipes called for an amazing quantity of butter. The recipe for bread, which made two loaves at once, called for 1 pound of butter. Pound Cake also uses a pound of butter.

Is milk being on every relief menu a sign that people had a derranged love for milk? Or just the strength of the milk lobby?

by ufo 5y ago

Is milk being on every relief menu a sign that people had a derranged love for milk? Or just the strength of the milk lobby?

jhbadger 5y ago

I don't think you can easily separate the two. Things might start as a marketing campaign but then catch on in general culture. In modern culture, this would be true of bacon. Bacon was falling out of favor in the US in the 1980s as people were beginning to become heart and weight conscious. But then there was a massive marketing push and now bacon is everywhere even on things like donuts. People think bacon is the most wondrous food/flavor and probably don't associate their obsession with a marketing campaign.

micromacrofoot 5y ago
you see this in a lot of food trends through the years... a lot of marketing-pushed popularity people aren't even aware of almonds and avocados are incredibly popular at the moment despite being particularly bad for the environment, they have their own lobbying groups and political action committees
MisterBastahrd 5y ago
People in the 80s were specifically told that animal fats were bad, and so everyone got fatter as the adjunct for fats in foods was sugar. All those years of having to put up with oat bran muffins because it was "heart healthy"... yuck. Don't get me wrong, I love bran flakes as a cereal. But that's where they belong.

orthoxerox 5y ago

People ate less meat/poultry back then. Dairy and eggs were the most common sources of animal fats and protein.

thatguy0900 5y ago

I mean it is cheap while being nutrient and calorie dense. It makes sense to put on a relief menu lobby or no

kgr 5y ago

I don't think it's because of the milk lobby (which didn't exist until early 1900s according to other posts) because I once browsed a cookbook from the 1800s and noticed that many of the recipes called for an amazing quantity of butter. The recipe for bread, which made two loaves at once, called for 1 pound of butter. Pound Cake also uses a pound of butter.