I was going to write that I didn't think it very good form to post failing code tests on the net, but having looked at the code - my god. I still think it's que

I was going to write that I didn't think it very good form to post failing code tests on the net, but having looked at the code - my god. I still think it's questionable manners but man that code is shocking. I was also going to say that I thought the naming of WebForm2 was the least of the code sample's problems, but on reflection, I think the writer is onto something - it really is quite emblematic of the lazy, sloppy thinking on display here. The same kind of person who thinks this code is acceptable is the exact same type of person who is too unbelievably lazy to even think of a better name than WebForm2.aspx. Not often you see code so bad that it feels almost voyeuristic looking at it.