3 ms·

We could collect those minerals from asteroids. We could also mine deep underground without disturbing the surface. But, open pit mining certainly is dramatical

We could collect those minerals from asteroids. We could also mine deep underground without disturbing the surface. But, open pit mining certainly is dramatically more cost effective than either of those options. My problem with open pit gold mines in particular is that, while gold does have industrial uses, the primary function is to be a shiny thing worth money and I find this activity to be arbitrary and not clear the bar of "worth destroying and toxifying a landscape" and thus greedful.

giantg2 5y ago
"We could collect those minerals from asteroids." Massively inefficient and requires huge amounts of energy beyond traditional mining. Yeah, about half of gold is used in jewelry. About a third is electronics.
- blamazon 5y ago
  Sure, asteroid mining would be expensive due to the challenges you pointed out. It would likely not be profitable any time soon. But not impossible. I bring this up because I just can't help but feel that open pit mining isn't technically necessary to advance as a civilization - it's just a practical choice that maximizes returns for proverbial shareholders. I feel we can do better as the apex species of our solar system.
  - mc32 5y ago
    Ah, rockets. Imagine all the exotic toxic materials necessary to launch as the solution to a lesser problem.
    - blamazon 5y ago
      Is there really that much exotic toxic stuff necessary in a rocket? Starship is made of steel and the fuel is already abundant. (Liquid oxygen and methane) Sure the engines are made of fancy alloys and such but those are reusable. I guess I don't know what the thermal tiles are made of or where that comes from. There's also kinetic launching - address the bootstrap problem by concentrating an amount of fancy metals and such in one giant motor that can be reused many times.
      - kdbeall_ 5y ago
        Also, gold content of asteroids is incredibly low. You'd be lucky to find a metallic asteroid with even 1 ppm of gold. Mines here on Earth often have grades above 4 ppm. The highest grade mines have above 20 ppm of gold. Second, let's say you find a M-type asteroid, how in the hell are you going to melt the nickel-iron and reprocess it for the valuable stuff like gold and platinum? Overall, asteroid mining is pretty idiotic. It will not be economical within our lifetimes and certainly will not play a role in producing the resources necessary for combating climate change.
mc32 5y ago
There are lots of things in the world we “don’t need”. We don’t need phones, we don’t need any “luxe” products, we don’t need restaurants, we don’t need video games, we don’t need youtube, we don’t need pornography, we don’t need more than two changes of clothing per season… but most have all the above. What’s the cutoff?
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]

giantg2 5y ago

"We could collect those minerals from asteroids." Massively inefficient and requires huge amounts of energy beyond traditional mining. Yeah, about half of gold is used in jewelry. About a third is electronics.

blamazon 5y ago
Sure, asteroid mining would be expensive due to the challenges you pointed out. It would likely not be profitable any time soon. But not impossible. I bring this up because I just can't help but feel that open pit mining isn't technically necessary to advance as a civilization - it's just a practical choice that maximizes returns for proverbial shareholders. I feel we can do better as the apex species of our solar system.
- mc32 5y ago
  Ah, rockets. Imagine all the exotic toxic materials necessary to launch as the solution to a lesser problem.
  - blamazon 5y ago
    Is there really that much exotic toxic stuff necessary in a rocket? Starship is made of steel and the fuel is already abundant. (Liquid oxygen and methane) Sure the engines are made of fancy alloys and such but those are reusable. I guess I don't know what the thermal tiles are made of or where that comes from. There's also kinetic launching - address the bootstrap problem by concentrating an amount of fancy metals and such in one giant motor that can be reused many times.
    - kdbeall_ 5y ago
      Also, gold content of asteroids is incredibly low. You'd be lucky to find a metallic asteroid with even 1 ppm of gold. Mines here on Earth often have grades above 4 ppm. The highest grade mines have above 20 ppm of gold. Second, let's say you find a M-type asteroid, how in the hell are you going to melt the nickel-iron and reprocess it for the valuable stuff like gold and platinum? Overall, asteroid mining is pretty idiotic. It will not be economical within our lifetimes and certainly will not play a role in producing the resources necessary for combating climate change.

mc32 5y ago

There are lots of things in the world we “don’t need”. We don’t need phones, we don’t need any “luxe” products, we don’t need restaurants, we don’t need video games, we don’t need youtube, we don’t need pornography, we don’t need more than two changes of clothing per season… but most have all the above. What’s the cutoff?

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]