4 ms·
I'm unsure how you rationalize calling the criticism naive, while at the same time 5 minutes later acknowledging and suggesting solutions for the exact same.
by Mo3 5y ago
I'm unsure how you rationalize calling the criticism naive, while at the same time 5 minutes later acknowledging and suggesting solutions for the exact same.
- danpalmer 5y agoThe criticism seems to be very anti-telemetry, or completely rejecting the idea of the smart/collaboration features. I think the issues are more nuanced than that.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 5y agoTaken more generously: * There is a lot of criticism. * At least some of that criticism is bad in this particular way. (As per an individual opinion.) * Here's a way to communicate the same criticism that is not bad in that particular way. As compared to the bug report: > I downloaded warp for the first time based on a link someone sent me about it being in public beta, but I'm immediately presented with a login form that I cannot dismiss. I know I cannot be the only developer who would never do a cloud login to use a terminal, let alone do it without any indication why it's needed or what it implies will be collected/transmitted to the warp team. Which is describing the software working as the developers intended and calling that a bug. Criticism can be expected to be better.