3 ms·
The same way that if a company puts pages you can access at `www.example.com/1` and you then access `www.example.com/2`, which you should not access, you're vio
by staticassertion 5y ago
The same way that if a company puts pages you can access at `www.example.com/1` and you then access `www.example.com/2`, which you should not access, you're violating the CFAA.
I haven't read the CFAA in a while but it is extremely broad. It boiled down to "if you access a system in a way you should not, illegal".
Or how accessing the same page a billion times per second, a page you have every right to access a few times, is illegal.
Or if you dial into a nuclear arms facility with your phone.
- albrewer 5y agoSo if I access it with a non-compliant browser that, say, doesn't run validation javascript when I submit a form, it's abuse? I think even the most tech illiterate judge would agree that, if I fill out a paper form and give it to someone at a company, it's on them to validate the information in it before executing a contract with the information inside it.
- staticassertion 5y agoI'm not a lawyer. I'm just saying that the CFAA is extremely broad.