I think this definition in the middle is quite intuitive. > That’s an example of “supernatural” behavior: e.g. when something happens not being obviously relat

I think this definition in the middle is quite intuitive. > That’s an example of “supernatural” behavior: e.g. when something happens not being obviously related to natural forces of the language. …And is bad exactly because of this fact: your natural tools and intuitions stop working, you need just to remember entire spellbook to deal with magical code. The words natural and spellbook could probably map onto idiomatic and confluence. lol I like it because magic code isn't bad, or slow, or unclever, it is often magic to achieve the opposite. But it does lack something like "being plain spoken"