3 ms·

Hahaha, yep I can see how that would go wrong :') > before I realised there was a change browser where I could discard that implementation. Haha nice! There'

Hahaha, yep I can see how that would go wrong :') > before I realised there was a change browser where I could discard that implementation. Haha nice! There's also a changes file. I guess I have another recommendation: Pharo is not just about the image. When you click on an image folder there are other files. Try to figure out what they do and how you could use it to your advantage. Check out what the pharo-local folder does for example. The iceberg folder there, for example, directly hosts the .git folder. I've used it at times if I couldn't get whatever I wanted to do in Iceberg to work (e.g. adding a remote). The .sources file shows the changes that you have.

ljm 5y ago
For sure. I started off with Squeak so I eventually got the git package installed and, in addition to updating the image and the changes file, it also wrote out the classes I added to disk - basically a directory being the class and every file inside the directory being the implementation of a method. It's hard for me to see what I'd deploy this way, as a pet project, but it's teaching me a lot more about a nice way to do OOP that also gives you an environment in which OOP can thrive.