3 ms·
Valid reasons... but definitely not "low-quality". When we're talking about "transparency" here, we're talking about finding small percentage of samples that c
by klodolph 5y ago
Valid reasons... but definitely not "low-quality".
When we're talking about "transparency" here, we're talking about finding small percentage of samples that can be ABX'd by people who are specifically listening for artifacts. For plenty of source material, you get transparency with MP3.
- astrange 5y agoYes, for almost all source material this is true. Unfortunately there's definitely killer samples out there that can be distinguished at 320kbit latest LAME with no effort at all. Also, rather than increasing complexity I think the newer better codecs are actually simpler than MP3, since we learned which parts of it helped and which didn't.