4 ms·
>with the original author of the tweet. Not necessarily. The example VOX article[1] had Trump's tweets embedded in the article, which are now hidden. Trump did
by macspoofing 5y ago
>with the original author of the tweet.
Not necessarily. The example VOX article[1] had Trump's tweets embedded in the article, which are now hidden. Trump didn't delete those tweets. He was banned.
[1] https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/4/13/17233422/donald-trump-james-comey-twitter-slime-ball https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/4/13/17233422/d...
- raverbashing 5y agoThere are many more cases of deletions than banned ones, let's not think of the exception as the rule And the blog author still has the text as well
- macspoofing 5y ago>There are many more cases of deletions than banned ones, let's not think of the exception as the rule But that isn't the exception. Banned users tend to be the ones that have some level of public interest, as evidenced by the VOX quote. >And the blog author still has the text as well That's right and maybe in some way this new policy accidentally leads to good things, in that it may incentive sites that embed Twitter's content on their page, to simply bypass that.