4 ms·
> Each king wanted more, for sure, but not the peasants, who didn't have much nor expected to have much ever. This is a projection. Revolts are as old as power
by southerntofu 5y ago
> Each king wanted more, for sure, but not the peasants, who didn't have much nor expected to have much ever.
This is a projection. Revolts are as old as power and inequalities. For the most well-known/well-studied of those, see this wikipedia page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_peasant_revolts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_peasant_revolts
(it's important to understand that most revolts are silently crushed and never documented, and that even for those that were documented in their time we did not necessarily keep good track of those documents over the centuries)
- koide 5y agoSocial inequality is listed as one factor among many. Do you know of revolts that were specifically about inequality? The ones I checked from the list were mostly religious, agricultural or nationalistic in nature. The ones I saw that could maybe be about inequality are due to the ruler being obnoxiously unjust or being unable to provide substenance. I wasn't saying revolts didn't exist, just that they weren't about wanting to be rich.