3 ms·
From this comment, I assume you ran testing or unstable. Stable is great for letting up a server and let it run on its own for years without any maintenance (H
by hyperman1 5y ago
From this comment, I assume you ran testing or unstable.
Stable is great for letting up a server and let it run on its own for years without any maintenance (HN warning: No maintenance is of course never a good idea, but at least Debian made it possible)
Testing ran in update conflicts at least once a month, but it was generally easy to resolve without bricking.
Unstable, well, the name says it all.
- Cloudef 5y agoNo unstable, just regular release. Same story with ubuntu and friends. Ironically I've had better experience with rolling release distros.
- 0des 5y agoRequesting you take cloud out of your name. We release you from the team. I regret to say we are going to have to provide you with a win11 laptop, and the authorities are on the way to claim the hardware you appear to be currently abusing.
- iso1210 5y agoHaven't run debian en-mass for a long time, for stable servers I stick the latest ubuntu 2004 and have unattended upgrades on, I haven't had any issues yet