4 ms·
I'm not sure if this article has gotten flagged out of existence, given that I don't see it on the front page anymore. But it seems a little fishy that the OP
by socratic 15y ago
I'm not sure if this article has gotten flagged out of existence, given that I don't see it on the front page anymore.
But it seems a little fishy that the OP got a -50 penalty from Google due to SEO, and now the OP is trying to get a blog post featuring one anecdotal data point about Google's results being unfair to the top of HN, no? I mean, the appearances seem a bit weird.
- cupcake_death 15y agoJust pointing out what seems to be a hypocrisy
- dannyr 15y agoBy having only one instance to prove your point? Show us more proof.
- cupcake_death 15y agohttp://www.google.com/search?q=Mark+Zuckerberg&pws=0 http://www.google.com/search?q=Mark+Zuckerberg&pws=0
- dannyr 15y agoDo you have stats to prove that the inbound links of the lower ranked sites are higher than Google+?
- cupcake_death 15y agoIn the case of LinkedIn vs. plus.google.com using Open Site Explorer, (Best source I have) this has double the amount of linking root domains, a well aged domain and a crawlable structure.