3 ms·
I have a google plus account, but I never use it, I've only visited his website once, as you can see by the purple links: http://i.imgur.com/xeULP.png http://i.
by citricsquid 15y ago
I have a google plus account, but I never use it, I've only visited his website once, as you can see by the purple links: http://i.imgur.com/xeULP.png http://i.imgur.com/xeULP.png
If I scroll futher down you can see 2 more instances of google plus -- http://i.imgur.com/1fHm5.png http://i.imgur.com/1fHm5.png, although I assume this is because I follow both Tom Anderson and Vic Gundotra. However for me personally I couldn't give a shit about g+ and it seems clear to me at least that they are (as the blog author suggests) boosting the position of g+ just because it's a google product.
- dannyr 15y agoWith yours, LinkedIn is below visualcv. Not in my case. I guess since people you follow on Google+ have shared something related to Guy Kawasaki, that's why Google deemed it more relevant. It doesn't factor in if you use Google+ or not. They are not only doing that with Google+ but with Twitter too.
- citricsquid 15y agoI switched to my other browsers running different google accounts, each positions his profile on g+ in the same place. The only thing my account is affecting is the bottom 2 g+ things. opera, work account: http://screensnapr.com/e/jZleuh.png http://screensnapr.com/e/jZleuh.png firefox, secure personal account: http://screensnapr.com/e/bTOdgq.png http://screensnapr.com/e/bTOdgq.png neither of those have google plus.
- dannyr 15y agoHis Google+ has 200K followers. His LinkedIn has 500+. My guess is that his Google+ profile is more visited than his LinkedIn. Maybe Google deserves some benefit of the doubt.