3 ms·
> Anyone I watch older than 50 years old Hey, now wait a second there, you young whipper-snapper. I'm sitting here reading HN while I install Debian on an XCP
by technothrasher 5y ago
> Anyone I watch older than 50 years old
Hey, now wait a second there, you young whipper-snapper. I'm sitting here reading HN while I install Debian on an XCP-ng VM, and I hear I can't understand whether Google results are good or not? There are plenty of us over 50 that actually lived the early internet and watched it first-hand transform into what it is today.
- redmen 5y agoI meant 60 ;)
- smitty1e 5y agoIndeed, there was a time when Slashdot was as tech-heavy and full of learning as HN.
- throwaway2037 5y agoWhat happened to Slashdot? Around 2000, I was a regular reader. Then, I fell away, but I cannot remember why.
- pers0n 5y agoAll the arguments were the same over and over. I remember reading the same comments that would come up all the time, the discussion got old. Plus the topics were very Linux, DRM focused. Digg had newer more interesting tech topics
- throwaway2037 5y agoThis is a great reply. Real question: Why hasn't the same happened to HN? To be fair, there are some arguments that play out over and over again: SF crime & homelessness, Bay Area housing, US taxes, central banks "printing money", office vs work-from-home, feeling forced to adopt liberal social views / stances at a tech company (Black Lives Matter, LGBTIQ+), etc. And somehow, there is still enough good, new content to keep the conversations fresh. Some of the best are when someone shares a personal story, then there are tens or hundreds of follow-up posts -- generally supportive or inquisitive.
- smitty1e 5y agoHN works because of the effort applied to downvote garbage replies and keep the tone sober ond collegial. I've had a number of replies get hammered, unfairly in my view. Yet the signal-to-noise ratio benefits overall if we eat a little Type I error now and then.