5 ms·
But that in itself would also be an ideological act. As we've just established, there's no "non-ideological". People who want Twitter to be non-ideological in
by malermeister 5y ago
But that in itself would also be an ideological act. As we've just established, there's no "non-ideological".
People who want Twitter to be non-ideological in reality just want it to represent some other ideology instead, they don't get to hide behind some veil of neutrality.
- Stupulous 5y agoYour point is that people who want Twitter to be neutral are ideological, because being pro-neutrality is itself an ideology? Even taking that as a given, they could still absolutely hide behind a veil of neutrality- they support neutrality, they're the people they invented the veil for. Or am I misunderstanding?
- throwaway894345 5y agoYes, pushing one’s ideology on people is technically an ideological concern as is the preference not to. But most of us find the latter more agreeable.